From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crook v. Merit Systems Protection Board

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
May 30, 2008
311 F. App'x 327 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2008-3221.

May 30, 2008.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in AT0752071004-1-1.

Stephanie Conley, Principal Attorney, Merit Systems Protection Board, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Raymon L. Crook, Orlando, FL, pro se.


ORDER

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) and to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.


Summaries of

Crook v. Merit Systems Protection Board

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
May 30, 2008
311 F. App'x 327 (Fed. Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Crook v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Case Details

Full title:Raymon L. CROOK, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: May 30, 2008

Citations

311 F. App'x 327 (Fed. Cir. 2008)