From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crook v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 16, 1993
81 N.Y.2d 807 (N.Y. 1993)

Opinion

Argued January 13, 1993

Decided February 16, 1993

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, Bernard L. Regan, J.

Andrew F. Plasse, Fayetteville, for appellants.

Saperston Day, P.C., Buffalo (Catherine Habermehl of counsel), for National Chemsearch, Division of N.C.H. Corp., respondent.

Falk Siemer, Buffalo (J. Joseph Wilder and Michael P. McClaren of counsel), for Hotsy Corporation, respondent.



Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 181 A.D.2d 1039).

Concur: Acting Chief Judge SIMONS and Judges KAYE, TITONE, BELLACOSA and SMITH. Taking no part: Judge HANCOCK, JR.


Summaries of

Crook v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 16, 1993
81 N.Y.2d 807 (N.Y. 1993)
Case details for

Crook v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours Co.

Case Details

Full title:CHERYL CROOK et al., Appellants, v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS COMPANY et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 16, 1993

Citations

81 N.Y.2d 807 (N.Y. 1993)
595 N.Y.S.2d 388
611 N.E.2d 289

Citing Cases

Seavey v. Korte

However, I opined that the First Department, by reason of its decision in Snediker v Rockefeller Ctr. ( 182…

Youngs v. Kissing Bridge Ski Corp.

Memorandum: Plaintiff failed to obtain leave pursuant to CPLR 3025 (b) and 1003 to serve an "amended summons…