From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crook v. Cnty. of San Bernadino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 17, 2016
NO. ED CV 14-1985-JVS (AS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2016)

Opinion

NO. ED CV 14-1985-JVS (AS)

03-17-2016

JASPER CROOK, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNADINO, et. al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint, all of the records herein, and the Second Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Second Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court finds that Plaintiff's Objections to the Second Report and Recommendation are without merit and do not cause the Court to reconsider its decision to accept the Magistrate Judge's conclusions and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on Plaintiff at his current address of record.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

DATED: March 17, 2016

/s/_________

JAMES V. SELNA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Crook v. Cnty. of San Bernadino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 17, 2016
NO. ED CV 14-1985-JVS (AS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2016)
Case details for

Crook v. Cnty. of San Bernadino

Case Details

Full title:JASPER CROOK, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNADINO, et. al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 17, 2016

Citations

NO. ED CV 14-1985-JVS (AS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2016)