From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cronin v. Anderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

March, 1929.


Order denying appellant's motion for an order directing the respondent to submit to a physical examination reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Respondent was examined by defendant's doctor prior to the beginning of the action. No examination was had "in the action," as provided by section 306 of the Civil Practice Act. Defendant, therefore, has not waived the statutory remedy. The case of Whitaker v. Staten Island M.R.R. Co. ( 76 App. Div. 351) can be distinguished, because in that case the first examination was had after the action had been instituted. Lazansky, P.J., Kapper and Scudder, JJ., concur; Rich and Carswell, JJ., dissent. Settle order on notice, at which time a physician to make the examination will be named and the time and place of the examination will be fixed.


Summaries of

Cronin v. Anderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Cronin v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL D. CRONIN, Respondent, and THE CONNECTICUT COMPANY, Plaintiff, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1929

Citations

226 App. Div. 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Citing Cases

Swiatlowski v. Kasprzyk

( Larzelere v. Schaffer, 2 A.D.2d 651. ) The defendant contends that the Larzelere case does not apply since…

McCabe v. Brooklyn and Queens Transit Corporation

October 8, 1937. Order denying defendant's motion for an order designating a neurologist to make an…