From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crompton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 21, 2003
842 So. 2d 950 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 1D02-5025.

Opinion filed March 21, 2003.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. Don T. Sirmons, Judge.

Appellant, pro se.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Although the trial court was incorrect to dismiss the appellant's second postconviction motion on the basis that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the claim therein, we affirm the trial court's order because the appellant's second motion was not filed within two years of the date that his judgment and sentence became final, and, despite the appellant's assertion to the contrary, the facts upon which the present motion is based do not meet the test for newly discovered evidence. See Jones v. State, 709 So.2d 512, 521 (Fla. 1988).

AFFIRMED.

ALLEN, C.J., WEBSTER and BROWNING, JJ. CONCUR.


Summaries of

Crompton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 21, 2003
842 So. 2d 950 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Crompton v. State

Case Details

Full title:RALPH EDWARD CROMPTON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 21, 2003

Citations

842 So. 2d 950 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)