From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cromleigh v. Chenot

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 3, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-275 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jan. 3, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-275 Erie.

January 3, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on October 11, 2007.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 12], filed on December 5, 2007, recommended that Petitioner's Petition be transferred forthwith to the Middle District of Pennsylvania. Plaintiff was allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections and service was made on Petitioner by certified mail. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2008;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is TRANSFERRED forthwith to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 12] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on December 5, 2007, is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The clerk is directed to mark the case closed.


Summaries of

Cromleigh v. Chenot

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 3, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-275 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jan. 3, 2008)
Case details for

Cromleigh v. Chenot

Case Details

Full title:TROY ALLEN CROMLEIGH, Petitioner, v. CHARLES F. CHENOT, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 3, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-275 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jan. 3, 2008)