From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cromitie v. Trump

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jun 11, 2020
Civil Action No. 19-2868 (UNA) (D.D.C. Jun. 11, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 19-2868 (UNA)

06-11-2020

JAMES CROMITIE, Plaintiff, v. DONALD J. TRUMP et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff, appearing pro se, has filed a motion under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, ECF No. 6. He seeks relief from the order entered on November 14, 2019, which dismissed this action for failure to state a claim under the Freedom of Information Act. See Mem. Op., ECF No. 4; Order, ECF No. 5. In its discretion, a court may relieve a party from a final judgment, order or proceeding for any one of six enumerated reasons. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1)-(6). Plaintiff has asserted no grounds to merit reopening this matter. See Thomas v. Holder, 750 F.3d 899, 902 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (a party seeking relief under Rule 60(b) must offer "a hint of a suggestion" that he might prevail if the case is reopened) (quoting Marino v. DEA, 685 F.3d 1076, 1080 (D.C. Cir. 2012)). Therefore, plaintiff's motion will be denied by separate order.

SIGNED: EMMET G. SULLIVAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATE: June 11, 2020


Summaries of

Cromitie v. Trump

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jun 11, 2020
Civil Action No. 19-2868 (UNA) (D.D.C. Jun. 11, 2020)
Case details for

Cromitie v. Trump

Case Details

Full title:JAMES CROMITIE, Plaintiff, v. DONALD J. TRUMP et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Jun 11, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 19-2868 (UNA) (D.D.C. Jun. 11, 2020)