From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cromer v. Clark Electric Company

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 7, 1968
206 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 1968)

Opinion

No. 36859.

February 7, 1968.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

L. Ralph Smith, Jr., of Peeples Smith, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Monroe E. McDonald, of Sanders, McEwan, Schwarz Mims, Orlando, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date of September 19, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is, therefore, dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

Petitioner's motion for attorney's fees is also denied.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C.J., and THOMAS, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cromer v. Clark Electric Company

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 7, 1968
206 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 1968)
Case details for

Cromer v. Clark Electric Company

Case Details

Full title:MARVIN CROMER, PETITIONER, v. CLARK ELECTRIC COMPANY, IOWA NATIONAL MUTUAL…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Feb 7, 1968

Citations

206 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 1968)