From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Croft v. Tillman

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 22, 1997
489 S.E.2d 852 (Ga. 1997)

Opinion

       William G. Fallin, Fallins&sMcIntosh, Moultrie, for Roger Croft.


       Richard L. Coleman, Coleman, Talley, Newbern, Kurrie, Valdosta, William C. McCalley, Kirbos&sMcCalley, Moultrie, for Don Tillman et al.

       PER CURIAM.

       The appellant appeals from the trial court's ruling that a writing on which he relied to establish his title to certain land was ineffective as a deed because the legal description of the property sought to be conveyed was insufficient. Because the writing, among other defects, fails to adequately describe the beginning point of the property or to provide a key by which the beginning point can be determined, we affirm the trial court's ruling without opinion.

See Hedden v. Hilton, 236 Ga. 641, 642-43, 225 S.E.2d 39 (1976).

       All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

Croft v. Tillman

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 22, 1997
489 S.E.2d 852 (Ga. 1997)
Case details for

Croft v. Tillman

Case Details

Full title:CROFT v. TILLMAN et al.

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Sep 22, 1997

Citations

489 S.E.2d 852 (Ga. 1997)