From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Croft v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec 20, 2013
136 So. 3d 658 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 2D13–1715.

2013-12-20

David Dean CROFT, a/k/a David Dark Horse, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.



David Dean Croft, pro se.


David Dean Croft, a/k/a David Dark Horse, appeals the postconviction court order dismissing in part and summarily denying in part his motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm. However, as to Mr. Croft's claim challenging his presumptive parole release date, our affirmance is without prejudice to pursue his administrative remedies with the Florida Parole Commission. If he is unsuccessful, he may seek mandamus relief in the appropriate circuit court. See Werts v. State, 113 So.3d 859 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); Sullivan v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 920 So.2d 106 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

Affirmed. CASANUEVA, VILLANTI, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Croft v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec 20, 2013
136 So. 3d 658 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Croft v. State

Case Details

Full title:David Dean CROFT, a/k/a David Dark Horse, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Dec 20, 2013

Citations

136 So. 3d 658 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)