From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Croft v. Bunting

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 16, 1938
1 A.2d 331 (N.J. 1938)

Opinion

Argued May 18, 1938 —

Decided September 16, 1938.

On appeal from the Camden County Circuit Court.

For the plaintiff-appellant, Joseph Beck Tyler.

For Thomas W. Bunting, Theodore C. Tiedeken and William H. Tiedeken, Boyle Archer.

For Earl W. Twitchell, Ralph N. Kellam.


We have carefully examined the record in these cases and the briefs and argument of counsel and can only conclude that the questions of fact were properly found and the questions of law were correctly settled by the learned trial judge.

The judgment is affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Croft v. Bunting

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 16, 1938
1 A.2d 331 (N.J. 1938)
Case details for

Croft v. Bunting

Case Details

Full title:EVELYN CROFT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THOMAS W. BUNTING…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 16, 1938

Citations

1 A.2d 331 (N.J. 1938)
1 A.2d 331