Opinion
No. 10868.
March 15, 1945.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Ralph E. Jenney, Judge.
Action between Crofott, Nielsen Co. and George A. McKinney and another, a copartnership doing business under the name and style of McKinney Blueprint. From an adverse judgment, Crofott, Nielsen Co. appeal.
Affirmed.
Harold W. Mattingly, of Los Angeles, Cal., and Joshua R.H. Potts and Eugene Vincent Clarke, both of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.
Avery M. Blount and Betty B. Gillette, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.
Before DENMAN, STEPHENS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.
Appellant contends that the evidence of the use of appellant's patent as substantially against the public interest does not support the finding to that effect. We do not agree.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed.