From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crocs, Inc. v. Acme Ex-Im, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 9, 2012
Civil Action No. 06-cv-00605-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. May. 9, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-cv-00605-PAB-BNB

05-09-2012

CROCS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ACME EX-IM, INC., AUSTRALIA UNLIMITED, INC., CHENG'S ENTERPRISES, INC., D. MEYERS & SONS, INC., DOUBLE DIAMOND DISTRIBUTION, LTD., EFFERVESCENT, INC., HOLEY SOLES HOLDINGS, LTD., INTER-PACIFIC TRADING CORPORATION, SHAKA HOLDINGS, INC., and DOES 1-10, Defendants.


Judge Philip A. Brimmer


ORDER LIFTING STAY

This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Lift Stay and Transfer Record [Docket No. 70] filed by plaintiff Crocs, Inc. On May 16, 2006, this Court administratively closed this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1659(a) [Docket No. 31] pending resolution of proceedings before the United States International Trade Commission (the "Commission"). Because the proceedings before the Commission are now final, plaintiff requests that the Court lift the stay and allow the case to continue. Docket No. 70 at 3. Additionally, plaintiff requests that the Court allow for the transfer of the record of the proceedings before the Commission to this Court. Id.

Having reviewed the pleading, the Court finds there is good cause to lift the stay and administratively re-open this case.

For the purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1659, the Commission proceedings become final after all appeals are exhausted. In re Princo Corp., 486 F.3d 1365, 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2007).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Motion to Lift Stay and Transfer Record [Docket No. 70] is GRANTED. It is further

ORDERED that the stay issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1659(a) is lifted and this case shall be administratively re-opened pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2. It is further

ORDERED that the record of the proceedings before the United States International Trade Commission shall be transmitted to this Court. It is further

ORDERED that, on or before June 8, 2012, the parties shall file status reports regarding what deadlines should be set in this matter.

BY THE COURT:

____________

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Crocs, Inc. v. Acme Ex-Im, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 9, 2012
Civil Action No. 06-cv-00605-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. May. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Crocs, Inc. v. Acme Ex-Im, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CROCS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ACME EX-IM, INC., AUSTRALIA UNLIMITED, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: May 9, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-cv-00605-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. May. 9, 2012)