From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crockford v. Spencer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Jun 11, 2012
CIV. NO. 3:10CV813(HBF) (D. Conn. Jun. 11, 2012)

Opinion

CIV. NO. 3:10CV813(HBF)

06-11-2012

KATHLEEN CROCKFORD v. LAWRENCE M. SPENCER, ET AL.


VERDICT FORM

We, the jury, unanimously award the following to compensate plaintiff for damages she has proven by a preponderance of the evidence were proximately caused by defendant's negligence:

Economic Damages: $ _________________________
Noneconomic Damages: $ _________________________
TOTAL $ _________________________

If you make no award as to either of the above items, you will insert the word "NONE" as to that item.

When you have finished answering the appropriate questions on this form, you may report your verdict.

The form should be signed and dated by the foreperson.

_________________________

Foreperson

_________________________

Date


Summaries of

Crockford v. Spencer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Jun 11, 2012
CIV. NO. 3:10CV813(HBF) (D. Conn. Jun. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Crockford v. Spencer

Case Details

Full title:KATHLEEN CROCKFORD v. LAWRENCE M. SPENCER, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Date published: Jun 11, 2012

Citations

CIV. NO. 3:10CV813(HBF) (D. Conn. Jun. 11, 2012)

Citing Cases

AngioDynamics, Inc. v. C.R. Bard

Because there is some basis for Dr. Frankel's assumption, the Court concludes that exclusion of this portion…