From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crockett v. State

Court of Appeals of Indiana.
Jan 31, 2019
121 N.E.3d 152 (Ind. App. 2019)

Opinion

Court of Appeals Case No. 18A-CR-391

01-31-2019

Antrone L. CROCKETT, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff

Appellant Pro Se: Antrone L. Crockett, South Bend, Indiana Attorneys for Appellee: Curtis T. Hill, Jr., Attorney General, Jesse R. Drum, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, Indiana


Appellant Pro Se: Antrone L. Crockett, South Bend, Indiana

Attorneys for Appellee: Curtis T. Hill, Jr., Attorney General, Jesse R. Drum, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, Indiana

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Vaidik, Chief Judge.

[1] In 2005, Antrone L. Crockett was convicted of Class A felony conspiracy to commit murder, and the trial court sentenced him to forty years. In 2018, Crockett filed a motion to correct erroneous sentence pursuant to Indiana Code section 35-38-1-15. Specifically, he argued that his "conviction is illegal on its Face" because the State did not properly charge him with conspiracy. Appellant's App. p. 22 (emphasis added). The trial court denied Crockett's motion without holding a hearing because he did not allege "that the sentence itself is erroneous on its face." Id. at 49. We affirm. The purpose of Section 35-38-1-15"is to provide prompt, direct access to an uncomplicated legal process for correcting the occasional erroneous or illegal sentence ." Robinson v. State , 805 N.E.2d 783, 785 (Ind. 2004) (emphasis added). Here, however, the basis of Crockett's motion is that his conviction—not his sentence—is illegal.

[2] Affirmed.

Mathias, J., and Crone, J., concur.


Summaries of

Crockett v. State

Court of Appeals of Indiana.
Jan 31, 2019
121 N.E.3d 152 (Ind. App. 2019)
Case details for

Crockett v. State

Case Details

Full title:Antrone L. CROCKETT, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana…

Court:Court of Appeals of Indiana.

Date published: Jan 31, 2019

Citations

121 N.E.3d 152 (Ind. App. 2019)