From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crockett v. Pope

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 24, 2005
No. CIV S-04-2614 DFL CMK P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2005)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-2614 DFL CMK P.

October 24, 2005


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


Plaintiff is a state prisoner who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

By order filed March 8, 2005, the court dismissed plaintiff's claims with leave to amend the complaint within thirty days. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Crockett v. Pope

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 24, 2005
No. CIV S-04-2614 DFL CMK P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2005)
Case details for

Crockett v. Pope

Case Details

Full title:Leon Wilson Crockett Plaintiff, v. Jim Pope Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 24, 2005

Citations

No. CIV S-04-2614 DFL CMK P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2005)