From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crockett v. Peake

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jun 20, 2008
Civil Action No. 08 1142 (D.D.C. Jun. 20, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08 1142.

June 20, 2008


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This matter is before the Court upon consideration of plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and his pro se complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed.

Plaintiff brings this action against the Secretary of Veterans Affairs seeking judicial review of an unspecified agency decision. Because plaintiff relies on 38 C.F.R. § 3.700 as a basis for this Court's jurisdiction, the Court presumes that the agency decision at issue pertains to the award of pension, compensation, or retirement pay. Generally, a federal district court has no authority to review the agency's decision regarding veterans benefits. See 38 U.S.C. § 511; Price v. United States, 228 F.3d 420, 421 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (per curiam), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 903 (2001) (the Veterans' Benefits Act of 1957 "precludes judicial review in Article III courts of VA decisions affecting the provision of veterans' benefits"). Accordingly, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion will be issued separately on this same date.


Summaries of

Crockett v. Peake

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jun 20, 2008
Civil Action No. 08 1142 (D.D.C. Jun. 20, 2008)
Case details for

Crockett v. Peake

Case Details

Full title:ERIC CROCKETT, Plaintiff, v. JAMES PEAKE, Secretary, Department of…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Jun 20, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 08 1142 (D.D.C. Jun. 20, 2008)