From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crockerham v. Weyerhaeuser Holden Wood Prods.

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Oct 2, 2014
NO. 2014 CW 1391 (La. Ct. App. Oct. 2, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 2014 CW 1391

10-02-2014

REGINALD CROCKERHAM v. WEYERHAEUSER HOLDEN WOOD PRODUCTS


In Re: Weyerhaeuser Holden Wood Products, applying for supervisory writs, Office of Workers' Compensation, District 6, No. 14-00401.

BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C.J., McCLENDON AND HIGGINBOTHAM, JJ.

WRIT DENIED.

TMH

VGW

McClendon, J. dissents and would grant the writ. I would reverse the September 17, 2014 judgment by the Workers' Compensation Administration denying the motion for summary judgment filed by defendant, Weyerhaeuser Holden Wood Products, and enter judgment in its favor, granting its motion. Plaintiff Reginald Crockerham has failed to produce factual support sufficient to establish that he will be able to satisfy his evidentiary burden at trial. See La. Code Civ. P. art. 966. Plaintiff suffers from degenerative disc disease, which is excluded from the classification of an occupational disease under the Workers' Compensation Act, and plaintiff has not experienced a work-related accident such that he is entitled to workers' compensation benefits. La. R.S. 23:1031(A); La. R.S. 23:1031.1(B); La. R.S. 23:1021(1). I would dismiss plaintiff's claims against defendant. COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT /s/_________

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

Crockerham v. Weyerhaeuser Holden Wood Prods.

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Oct 2, 2014
NO. 2014 CW 1391 (La. Ct. App. Oct. 2, 2014)
Case details for

Crockerham v. Weyerhaeuser Holden Wood Prods.

Case Details

Full title:REGINALD CROCKERHAM v. WEYERHAEUSER HOLDEN WOOD PRODUCTS

Court:STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 2, 2014

Citations

NO. 2014 CW 1391 (La. Ct. App. Oct. 2, 2014)