From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crockenberg v. Gonzalez

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 18, 2023
No. A-1006-22 (App. Div. Oct. 18, 2023)

Opinion

A-1006-22

10-18-2023

GERARD CROCKENBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. YESENIA GONZALEZ, f/k/a YESENIA CROCKENBERG, Defendant-Respondent.

Rigden Lieberman, LLC, attorneys for appellant (Ronald G. Lieberman, on the briefs). Forkin, McShane, Manos & Rotz, PA, attorneys for respondent (Richard B. Rotz, on the brief).


This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

Submitted October 10, 2023

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Camden County, Docket No. FM-04-0439-08.

Rigden Lieberman, LLC, attorneys for appellant (Ronald G. Lieberman, on the briefs).

Forkin, McShane, Manos & Rotz, PA, attorneys for respondent (Richard B. Rotz, on the brief).

Before Judges Gilson and Berdote Byrne.

PER CURIAM.

We have been advised that this matter has been amicably resolved and the parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Crockenberg v. Gonzalez

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 18, 2023
No. A-1006-22 (App. Div. Oct. 18, 2023)
Case details for

Crockenberg v. Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:GERARD CROCKENBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. YESENIA GONZALEZ, f/k/a…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Oct 18, 2023

Citations

No. A-1006-22 (App. Div. Oct. 18, 2023)