From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CROCK v. CITY/TOWN OR BORO OF MT. LEBANON, PENNA

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 31, 2009
Civil Action No. 09-426 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-426.

August 31, 2009


ORDER


On August 18, 2009, the undersigned's Chambers transmitted to Plaintiff two Orders, via First-Class U.S. Mail, at the address: PO Box 16394, Pittsburgh, PA 15242. The Orders were returned to the Court, marked "RETURN TO SENDER[,] ATTEMPTED — NOT KNOWN[,] UNABLE TO FORWARD." See Appendix hereto.

A review of Plaintiff's initial filings reveals two possible addresses, differing only in zip codes, "15242" and "15203." See Doc. 1-2 at pg. 1 of 5 (IRS Form 1040, identifying 15242); id. at pg. 5 of 5 (Motion for IFP, identifying 15242); Doc 1-3 (Complaint, identifying 15203); and Doc. 1-4 (Civil Cover Sheet, identifying 15242).

The Clerk's Office entered into CM/ECF Plaintiff's address with the zip code 15242. Because the Court's recent mailings have been returned to sender, the undersigned's Chambers today will mail copies of the August 18th Orders to Plaintiff at both addresses.

It is Plaintiff's obligation, not the Court's, to ensure that his true and accurate mailing address is identified in the record. Therefore, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a notice of address form with the Clerk's Office, identifying his correct address.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Exhibit


Summaries of

CROCK v. CITY/TOWN OR BORO OF MT. LEBANON, PENNA

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 31, 2009
Civil Action No. 09-426 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2009)
Case details for

CROCK v. CITY/TOWN OR BORO OF MT. LEBANON, PENNA

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS D. CROCK, Plaintiff, v. CITY/TOWN OR BORO OF MT. LEBANON, PENNA.…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 31, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-426 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2009)