From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crock v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 30, 2008
Civil Action No. 08-680 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 30, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-680.

September 30, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


The record in this case reflects that complaint in this civil action was filed by plaintiff on May 19, 2008. Pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, service of a summons and complaint is to be effectuated upon all named defendants within 120 days of the filing of the complaint, with proof of same being filed with the court. None was filed and on September 18, 2008, a show cause order was issued to plaintiff, requesting that cause be shown by September 29, 2008 why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. As of the date of this order, plaintiff has failed to respond.

Therefore, under the circumstances, and pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b), we will exercise our inherent power to dismiss the case due to the inaction of the party seeking relief. See Link v. Wabash Railroad Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1961).

Accordingly, this 30th day of September, 2008, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the instant case is dismissed.


Summaries of

Crock v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 30, 2008
Civil Action No. 08-680 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 30, 2008)
Case details for

Crock v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS D. CROCK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 30, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-680 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 30, 2008)