From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Croce v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 29, 2002
297 A.D.2d 257 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

5223

August 29, 2002.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.), entered April 7, 2000, which, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of defendant's liability under Labor Law § 240(1), and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment insofar as addressed to the cause of action under Labor Law § 240(1) and denied the cross motion insofar as addressed to the cause of action under Labor Law § 241(6), unanimously modified, on the law, to dismiss the cause of action under Labor Law § 241(6), and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

ALEXANDER J. WULWICK, for plaintiffs-appellants-respondents.

JUDAH Z. COHEN, for defendant-respondent-appellant.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Sullivan, Ellerin, Rubin, Friedman, JJ.


Plaintiff, a Transit Authority employee, alleges that he fell off a ladder while attaching a three-by-five-foot bulletin board to the wall of a subway station locker room owned by defendant City. The motion court correctly held that such work did not involve "making a significant physical change to the configuration or composition of the building or structure," and therefore did not constitute "altering" within the meaning of Labor Law § 240(1) (Joblon v. Solow, 91 N.Y.2d 457, 465;compare, Futterman v. Rela Realty Corp., 283 A.D.2d 261, with Catoliato v. Sam's Club, 254 A.D.2d 62, lv dismissed 93 N.Y.2d 888).

Plaintiff's claims based on Labor Law § 241(6) should also have been dismissed since plaintiff was not performing any of the tasks enumerated in Rule 23 of the Industrial Code ( 12 NYCRR 23-1.4 [b][13]) when he was injured (see, Joblon, supra, at 466).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Croce v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 29, 2002
297 A.D.2d 257 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Croce v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:MARVIN DELLA CROCE, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS, v. THE CITY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Aug 29, 2002

Citations

297 A.D.2d 257 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
746 N.Y.S.2d 484

Citing Cases

Spencer v. 322 Partners, L.L.C.

t drilling a few holes and installing a temporary sign did not constitute an alteration under Labor Law §…

Peluso v. 69 Tiemann Owners Corp.

Liability under this statute is limited to accidents where the work being performed involves construction,…