From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Critical Path Res., Inc. v. Cuevas

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
May 8, 2018
582 S.W.3d 348 (Tex. App. 2018)

Opinion

NO. 14-16-00036-CV

05-08-2018

CRITICAL PATH RESOURCES, INC., Appellant v. Richard CUEVAS, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Nicolas Oscar Cuevas, Daniel Cuevas, Nicolas Cuevas, Maria Cuevas, Guadalupe Torres, Blanca Rodriguez, Luis De Los Santos, Blake Smith, and Tamatha Smith, Appellees

R. Russell Hollenbeck, E. Marie Jamison, Howard L. Close, Houston, for Appellant. Andrew Dao, Houston, Anthony Glenn Buzbee, Ryan Pigg, William David George, Houston, for Appellees.


R. Russell Hollenbeck, E. Marie Jamison, Howard L. Close, Houston, for Appellant.

Andrew Dao, Houston, Anthony Glenn Buzbee, Ryan Pigg, William David George, Houston, for Appellees.

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Busby, and Jewell

SUPPLEMENTAL MAJORITY OPINION

J. Brett Busby, Justice

On March 29, 2018, we issued our original majority opinion in this case suggesting remittiturs for appellees Daniel Cuevas, Nicolas Cuevas, and Maria Cuevas. We explained that if Daniel, Mr. Cuevas, and Mrs. Cuevas filed this remittitur within twenty days from the date of our original opinion, we would modify the trial court’s judgment accordingly. We suggested the following remittiturs: (1) for Daniel’s future medical damages, a remittitur of $279,342; (2) for Mr. Cuevas’s non-pecuniary damages, a remittitur of $420,000; and (3) for Mrs. Cuevas’s non-pecuniary damages, a remittitur of $360,000. All three appellees timely accepted the suggested remittiturs. Subsequently, the parties submitted an agreed statement (without prejudice to Critical Path’s further appellate rights) regarding the amount of the modified judgment taking into account the accepted remittiturs as well as prejudgment interest.

We therefore issue this supplemental majority opinion. In accordance with the original majority opinion, appellees' timely-filed remittiturs, and the parties' agreed statement, we modify the trial court’s judgment to reflect (1) Daniel’s total recovery of all damages: $4,637,743.23; (2) Mr. Cuevas’s total recovery of all damages: $152,828.03; and (3) Mrs. Cuevas’s total recovery of all damages: $212,828.03. These amounts include prejudgment interest. We affirm the trial court’s judgment as modified. Our original opinions remain otherwise in effect.

( Jewell, J., dissenting).


Summaries of

Critical Path Res., Inc. v. Cuevas

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
May 8, 2018
582 S.W.3d 348 (Tex. App. 2018)
Case details for

Critical Path Res., Inc. v. Cuevas

Case Details

Full title:CRITICAL PATH RESOURCES, INC., Appellant v. RICHARD CUEVAS, INDIVIDUALLY…

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: May 8, 2018

Citations

582 S.W.3d 348 (Tex. App. 2018)

Citing Cases

Massage Heights Franchising, LLC v. Hagman

To be a new and independent cause, the intervening cause must be both unforeseeable and a superseding cause…

Livingston v. Gregurek

Based on this undisputed evidence, appellees assert Harris County was a proper venue for their claims because…