From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Criswell v. Fields

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jul 22, 2024
2:22-CV-00249-BSM (E.D. Ark. Jul. 22, 2024)

Opinion

2:22-CV-00249-BSM

07-22-2024

ERIC McGAIL CRISWELL ADC #165409 PLAINTIFF v. UNDRAY FIELDS, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

After careful review of the record, United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris's recommended disposition [Doc. No. 41] is adopted, and defendants' motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 38] is granted. This case is dismissed without prejudice because Eric Criswell failed to respond to discovery requests as directed. See Doc. No. 37.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Criswell v. Fields

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jul 22, 2024
2:22-CV-00249-BSM (E.D. Ark. Jul. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Criswell v. Fields

Case Details

Full title:ERIC McGAIL CRISWELL ADC #165409 PLAINTIFF v. UNDRAY FIELDS, et al…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jul 22, 2024

Citations

2:22-CV-00249-BSM (E.D. Ark. Jul. 22, 2024)