From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crisp v. Caruso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 8, 2016
Case No. 2:14-cv-14132 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 8, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 2:14-cv-14132

11-08-2016

MAURICE CRISP, Plaintiff, v. PATRICIA CARUSO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (document no. 18) AND DISMISSING THE CASE

Maurice Crisp is a prisoner currently in the custody of the Michigan Department of Corrections. He alleged in his lawsuit that while he was incarcerated at the St. Louis, Michigan Correctional Facility, he ingested contaminated water and as a result, developed numerous health complications. The Court referred the matter to a magistrate judge who permitted Crisp to cure the defects of his original complaint. Referral Order, ECF No. 10; Order 8-9, ECF No. 13. After Crisp amended his complaint, the magistrate judge entered a Report and Recommendation suggesting the Court dismiss the case as time-barred. See Report 6, ECF No. 18.

De novo review of the magistrate judge's findings is only required if the parties "serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Pursuant to Civil Rule 72(b)(2), the parties were permitted to file objections to the Report within 14 days of service. No objections were filed, and therefore de novo review of the Report is not required. Having reviewed the Report's analysis, in light of the record, the Court finds that its conclusions are factually based and legally sound. Accordingly, it will adopt the Report's findings and dismiss the complaint with prejudice.

ORDER

WHEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (document no. 18) is ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED.

s/Stephen J. Murphy, III

STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III

United States District Judge Dated: November 8, 2016 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on November 8, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/David P. Parker

Acting Case Manager


Summaries of

Crisp v. Caruso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 8, 2016
Case No. 2:14-cv-14132 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 8, 2016)
Case details for

Crisp v. Caruso

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE CRISP, Plaintiff, v. PATRICIA CARUSO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 8, 2016

Citations

Case No. 2:14-cv-14132 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 8, 2016)