From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crisolo v. State

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Sep 30, 2003
25937 (Haw. Sep. 30, 2003)

Opinion

25937

September 30, 2003.

APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT (S.P.P. NO. 03-1-0025)


ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL


Upon review of the record, it appears that (1) the supreme court clerk's office informed Appellant, by letter dated September 12, 2003, that the record on appeal cannot be filed without payment of the filing fee pursuant to Rule 3(f) of the Hawai`i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) or an executed motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to HRAP Rule 24 and that the matter would be called to the attention of the court for such action as the court deemed proper pursuant to HRAP Rule 11(a), including dismissal of the appeal; and (2) appellant failed to pay the filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Crisolo v. State

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Sep 30, 2003
25937 (Haw. Sep. 30, 2003)
Case details for

Crisolo v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAY CRISOLO, Petitioner-Appellant v. STATE OF HAWAI`I, Respondent-Appellee

Court:Supreme Court of Hawaii

Date published: Sep 30, 2003

Citations

25937 (Haw. Sep. 30, 2003)