From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crisanto v. Raybon

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 30, 2001
798 So. 2d 11 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 1D01-1047.

September 24, 2001. Rehearing Denied October 30, 2001.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County, Glenn L. Hess, Judge.

John J. Uskert, Panama City, for Appellant.

Monica L. Cothran of James Cothran Chartered, Panama City, for Appellee.


We affirm the Order Denying Motion to Vacate Order of Modification because the findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence and we cannot say that the holding constitutes an abuse of discretion. Appellant also complains about the trial court's failure to rule on her request for attorney's fees and costs. Appellee concedes error. On remand, the trial court shall rule on appellant's request for attorney's fees and costs.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.

WEBSTER, BROWNING and POLSTON, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Crisanto v. Raybon

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 30, 2001
798 So. 2d 11 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Crisanto v. Raybon

Case Details

Full title:Nancy Rose CRISANTO, f/k/a Nancy Rose Raybon, Appellant, v. Pierre Andre…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Oct 30, 2001

Citations

798 So. 2d 11 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)