From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crippen v. City of Fresno

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 10, 2006
Case No. CIV-F-03-6818 OWW/DLB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-F-03-6818 OWW/DLB.

February 10, 2006

BETTS WRIGHT, A Professional Corporation, Attorneys at Law, Fresno, CA, James B. Betts (State Bar #110222), Joseph D. Rubin (State Bar #149920), Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF FRESNO.


ORDER ON EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER PERMITTING THE FILING OF A LONGER MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT/SUMMARY ADJUDICATION special notice to counsel: ORDER HAS BEEN MODIFIED


GOOD CAUSE having been shown, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant City of Fresno may file a memorandum of points and authorities of up to ___35____ pages in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment Or, in the Alternative, for Partial Summary Judgment/Summary Adjudication. Plaintiff may have the same amount of pages in opposition, and the City of Fresno may have ___10___ pages in reply. Plaintiff shall have five additional court days to file his opposition (oww).


Summaries of

Crippen v. City of Fresno

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 10, 2006
Case No. CIV-F-03-6818 OWW/DLB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2006)
Case details for

Crippen v. City of Fresno

Case Details

Full title:ARCHIE CRIPPEN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF FRESNO and DOES 1 through 40…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 10, 2006

Citations

Case No. CIV-F-03-6818 OWW/DLB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2006)