From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cricket Grp., Ltd. v. Highmark Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 31, 2017
Civil Action No. 16-1141 (W.D. Pa. May. 31, 2017)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 16-1141

05-31-2017

CRICKET GROUP, LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. HIGHMARK INC., Defendant.



Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell MEMORANDUM ORDER

This case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72.

On March 31, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 58) recommending that Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 53) be granted in part and denied in part. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made, and Defendant has filed Objections. See Doc. 59.

After a de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the Objections thereto, the following Order is entered:

Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 53) is GRANTED regarding Count IV of the Second Amended Complaint, and otherwise DENIED. The Report and Recommendation hereby is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED. May 31, 2017

s\Cathy Bissoon

Cathy Bissoon

United States District Judge cc (via ECF email notification): All counsel of record


Summaries of

Cricket Grp., Ltd. v. Highmark Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 31, 2017
Civil Action No. 16-1141 (W.D. Pa. May. 31, 2017)
Case details for

Cricket Grp., Ltd. v. Highmark Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CRICKET GROUP, LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. HIGHMARK INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 31, 2017

Citations

Civil Action No. 16-1141 (W.D. Pa. May. 31, 2017)