From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crews v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 26, 1987
502 So. 2d 1360 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 86-1467.

February 26, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County; E.L. Eastmoore, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Kenneth Witts, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Pamela D. Cichon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a sentence which is excessive because it departs from the recommended guidelines sentence and no proper reasons for departure were given. Because appellant has served the prison-time portion of the sentence, which was the excessive part, this appeal is essentially moot. However, it should be shown on appellant's record and the trial judge should be advised that the sentence was erroneous, as mentioned.

PORTION OF SENTENCE VACATED.

ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Crews v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 26, 1987
502 So. 2d 1360 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Crews v. State

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD LEVERETTE CREWS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Feb 26, 1987

Citations

502 So. 2d 1360 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Rhodes v. State

However, if the Defendant was not awarded the proper credit for time served, his corrected sentence should be…

Lampley v. State

Although the appellant has served the incarcerative portion of his split sentence, the issue is still viable…