From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crew v. Truckee-Carson Irrigation Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA RENO, NEVADA
Aug 18, 2011
3:10-cv-00313-ECR-VPC (D. Nev. Aug. 18, 2011)

Opinion

3:10-cv-00313-ECR-VPC

08-18-2011

CHARLES CREW and MICHAEL T. STORY, Plaintiffs, v. TRUCKEE-CARSON IRRIGATION DISTRICT; WALT WINDER, individually and in his official capacity as Watermaster/O&M Foreman; KATE RUTAN, individually and in his official capacity as Hydro Electric/Dam Release Manager, Defendants.

Counsel for Plaintiff(s) NONE APPEARING Counsel for Defendant(s) NONE APPEARING


MINUTES OF THE COURT

PRESENT: , JR. U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Deputy Clerk: COLLEEN LARSEN Reporter: NONE APPEARING

Counsel for Plaintiff(s) NONE APPEARING

Counsel for Defendant(s) NONE APPEARING

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS

Plaintiffs make various claims stemming from their alleged wrongful termination from employment with the Truckee-Carson Irrigation District.

On December 28, 2010, Defendants filed a motion (#20) for summary judgment or, in the alternative, motion for summary adjudication (the "MSJ"). On January 19, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a motion (#21) to extend time to respond to the MSJ. On January 20, 2011, we issued an order (# granting Plaintiffs' motion (#21) to extend time to respond to the MSJ. February 23, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a second motion (#23) to extend time to respond to the MSJ. On May 2, 2011, we entered an order (#25) granting Plaintiffs' motion (#23) to extend time to respond to the MSJ and holding that failure to respond to the MSJ within twenty (20) days would result in the Court's immediate decision on the MSJ.

On May 24, 2011, Defendants filed a notice (#26) of non-opposition indicating that Plaintiffs failed to respond to the MSJ on or before May 23, 2011. We will therefore grant Defendants' motion (#20) for summary judgment or, in the alternative, motion for summary adjudication.

IT IS, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motion (#20) for summary judgment or, in the alternative, motion for summary adjudication is GRANTED .

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion (#16) to dismiss without prejudice Plaintiffs' First Amendment claim is DENIED as moot.

The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By __________________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Crew v. Truckee-Carson Irrigation Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA RENO, NEVADA
Aug 18, 2011
3:10-cv-00313-ECR-VPC (D. Nev. Aug. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Crew v. Truckee-Carson Irrigation Dist.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES CREW and MICHAEL T. STORY, Plaintiffs, v. TRUCKEE-CARSON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA RENO, NEVADA

Date published: Aug 18, 2011

Citations

3:10-cv-00313-ECR-VPC (D. Nev. Aug. 18, 2011)