From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crew v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 27, 2016
Case No. EDCV 13-1886-FMO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 13-1886-FMO (JEM)

09-27-2016

ARRION LEE CREW, JR., Petitioner, v. W.L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: September 27, 2016

/s/_________

FERNANDO M. OLGUIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Crew v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 27, 2016
Case No. EDCV 13-1886-FMO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2016)
Case details for

Crew v. Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:ARRION LEE CREW, JR., Petitioner, v. W.L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 27, 2016

Citations

Case No. EDCV 13-1886-FMO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2016)