From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crestmark v. Teleescrow, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 21, 2022
22 CIVIL 385 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 21, 2022)

Opinion

22 CIVIL 385 (LGS)

03-21-2022

CRESTMARK, Plaintiff, v. TELEESCROW, INC., Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated March 16, 2022, Plaintiffs Motion is GRANTED. Subject matter jurisdiction exists because there is complete diversity between the parties and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). In addition, Defendant's confession of judgment was made knowingly and voluntarily and contains the information required by C.P.L.R. § 3218(a), including stating the sum for which judgment may be entered. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs in the amount of $6,164,777.47.


Summaries of

Crestmark v. Teleescrow, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 21, 2022
22 CIVIL 385 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Crestmark v. Teleescrow, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CRESTMARK, Plaintiff, v. TELEESCROW, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 21, 2022

Citations

22 CIVIL 385 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 21, 2022)