Crestmark v. Teleescrow, Inc.

Full title: CRESTMARK, Plaintiff, v. TELEESCROW, INC., Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 14, 2022

22 Civ. 385 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 14, 2022)

Opinion

22 Civ. 385 (LGS)

03-14-2022

CRESTMARK, Plaintiff, v. TELEESCROW, INC., Defendant.

LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, DISTRICT JUDGE:

ORDER

LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, DISTRICT JUDGE:

WHEREAS, pursuant to the February 10, 2022, Stipulation and Order, Defendant's answer was due February 16, 2022. (Dkt. No. 32.)

WHEREAS, no such answer was filed. (See Dkt. No. 33.)

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court's February 17, 2022, Order, Defendant's answer was due February 18, 2022. (Dkt. No. 33.)

WHEREAS, on February 18, 2022, the parties filed a proposed Stipulation and Order, which the Court entered on February 22, 2022. Pursuant to the Order, Defendant's answer was due February 25, 2022. (Dkt. No. 35.)

WHEREAS, on February 23, 2022, the parties filed a proposed Stipulation and Order, which the Court entered on February 24, 2022. Pursuant to the Order, Defendant's answer is due March 11, 2022. (Dkt. No. 37.)

WHEREAS, no such answer was filed. It is hereby

ORDERED that by March 16, 2022, Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. No further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. Failure to answer or other respond may result in entry of a default judgment against Defendant.