From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cresta Blanca Wine Co. v. Eastern Wine Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Apr 10, 1944
56 F. Supp. 176 (S.D.N.Y. 1944)

Opinion

April 10, 1944.

Mock Blum, of New York City, for Cresta Blanca and Schenley Distillers Corporation.

Darby Darby, of New York City, for defendant.


Action by the Cresta Blanca Wine Company, Inc., against the Eastern Wine Corporation for infringement of a trade-mark and for a declaratory judgment, wherein Schenley Distillers Corporation filed a motion to intervene in the action and to stay prosecution of two actions by the defendant in the District Court for the District of Delaware, the first against the Cresta Blanca Wine Company, Inc., and the second against Schenley Distillers Corporation.

Motion denied.

Order reversed 143 F.2d 1012.


The motion for an order staying defendant and its attorneys from taking any further action as plaintiff in two actions in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and for an order permitting Schenley Distillers Corporation, to intervene herein, is denied.

Cresta Blanca Wine Co., Inc., a Delaware corporation (and successor in interest to Cresta Blanca Wine Company a California corporation), is conceded to be a wholly owned subsidiary of Schenley Distillers Corporation, also a Delaware corporation.

On February 21, 1944, the plaintiff brought this action against Eastern Wine Corporation, a New York Corporation, alleging a first cause of action for infringement of a trade mark and a second cause of action for a declaratory judgment. Thereafter, the Eastern Wine Company brought two actions in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against the Cresta Blanca Wine Co., Inc., and Schenley Distillers Corporation, respectively, alleging infringement and unfair competition in each case. Schenley moves to intervene in this action and to stay the prosecution of both actions in Delaware.

Since the plaintiff is a separate entity and has the sole right to the trade mark and the use thereof which is the subject matter of this action, Schenley, whose only interest is as a stockholder, has no legal status which entitles it to intervene and consequently has no right to an order of this court staying the prosecution of either action in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware.


Summaries of

Cresta Blanca Wine Co. v. Eastern Wine Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Apr 10, 1944
56 F. Supp. 176 (S.D.N.Y. 1944)
Case details for

Cresta Blanca Wine Co. v. Eastern Wine Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CRESTA BLANCA WINE CO., Inc., v. EASTERN WINE CORPORATION

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Apr 10, 1944

Citations

56 F. Supp. 176 (S.D.N.Y. 1944)

Citing Cases

Cresta Blanca Wine Co. v. Eastern Wine Corp.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Action for…