From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crespo v. Chan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 23, 2008
54 A.D.3d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

September 23, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy S. Friedman, J.), entered May 11, 2007, which denied plaintiffs motion to set aside a jury verdict in defendants' favor, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Lippman, P.J., Tom, Williams, McGuire and Freedman, JJ.


A fair interpretation of the evidence in this action arising out of an alleged motor vehicle accident supports the finding that the vehicle in which plaintiff was a passenger and the vehicle driven by defendant Phan never even came into contact, as defendant Phan testified. Accordingly, the jury reasonably could have concluded that defendant Phan did not cause the injury to plaintiffs right arm that plaintiff claimed he suffered ( see McDermott v Coffee Beanery, Ltd., 9 AD3d 195, 206). Issues of credibility are for the jury and its resolution of such issues is entitled to deference ( see White v New York City Tr. Auth., 40 AD3d 297, 297-298). Furthermore, the evidence shows that it was reasonable to conclude that Phan exercised due care when checking the traffic conditions prior to backing his taxi out of an angled-in parking space.


Summaries of

Crespo v. Chan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 23, 2008
54 A.D.3d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Crespo v. Chan

Case Details

Full title:ELIAS CRESPO, Appellant, v. KWON F. CHAN et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 23, 2008

Citations

54 A.D.3d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
866 N.Y.S.2d 624

Citing Cases

Spagnoli-Scheman v. Bellew

The jury's verdict was based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence ( see generally McDermott v. Coffee…

Lopez v. City of N.Y.

We cannot discount the possibility that the jury, having observed the officers' recounting of the incident,…