From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crescini v. Standard Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 6, 2011
Case No.: CV 11-02328 EJD (N.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: CV 11-02328 EJD

10-06-2011

LORELEI CRESCINI, Plaintiff, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

CONSTANTIN V. ROBOOSTOFF 69328 ROBOOSTOFF & KALKIN A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION Attorneys for Plaintiff LORELEI CRESCINI Attorney for Defendant STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY


WARREN H. NELSON, JR. #104744

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

Attorney for Defendant

STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH

PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION

No hearing set or required.

Counsel for the parties, Plaintiff Lorelei Crescini and Defendant Standard Insurance Company ("Standard"), jointly and respectfully submit this Stipulation and Order for Dismissal with Prejudice of this entire action, following settlement of this matter on terms that are confidential.

More specifically, each and all of the parties hereto, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, stipulate to the dismissal of this entire action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), each party to bear her or its own costs, expenses and attorney fees. The parties further stipulate that this Court shall retain continuing jurisdiction over any dispute arising out of the settlement of this matter. The parties add that there is no dispute currently and none is anticipated.

Local Civil Rule 7-12, Stipulations, provides:

Every stipulation requesting judicial action must be in writing signed by all affected parties or their counsel. A proposed form of order may be submitted with the stipulation and may consist of an endorsement on the stipulation of the words, "PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED," with spaces designated for the date and the signature of the Judge.
Pursuant to their settlement and the terms of Local Rule 7-12, the parties respectfully request that the Court enter the Order that follows. So Stipulated:

CONSTANTIN V. ROBOOSTOFF 69328

ROBOOSTOFF & KALKIN

A PROFESSIONAL LAW

CORPORATION

Attorneys for Plaintiff

LORELEI CRESCINI

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

Attorney for Defendant

STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

Pursuant to General Order No. 45 § XB, I, Warren H. Nelson, Jr., the e filer of this document, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory shown above, Constantin V. Roboostoff, Esq, who is a registered "e filer" with this Court.

WARREN H. NELSON, JR. # 104744 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk shall close this file.

EDWARD J. DAVILA, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Crescini v. Standard Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 6, 2011
Case No.: CV 11-02328 EJD (N.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)
Case details for

Crescini v. Standard Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:LORELEI CRESCINI, Plaintiff, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 6, 2011

Citations

Case No.: CV 11-02328 EJD (N.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)