From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crescent Lumber Shingle Company v. Rotherum

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jan 25, 1955
218 F.2d 638 (5th Cir. 1955)

Opinion

No. 14994.

January 25, 1955.

Wm. Madden Hill, Dallas, Tex., Ungerman, Hill Ungerman, Dallas, Tex., for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, HOLMES, Circuit Judge, and ALLRED, District Judge.


Appellant, a Washington corporation, sued defendants, resident citizens of Texas, upon a sworn account for materials (lumber) furnished in the amount of $2,767.45, and $500 alleged to be reasonable attorney's fees. The trial court dismissed the complaint for want of jurisdiction, on the theory that the attorney's fees were not recoverable, and therefore the amount in controversy did not exceed $3,000, exclusive of interest and costs. This was error.

Under Rule 185, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, formerly Art. 3736, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes.

Article 2226, Vernon's Civil Statutes, as amended Acts 1953, 53rd Leg., p. 101, ch. 67, § 1, clearly provides for recovery of reasonable attorney's fees, in addition to the claim and costs, on valid claims for, among other things, materials furnished, or suits founded upon on a sworn account or accounts. This right to reasonable attorney's fees, in addition to the claim and costs, is a liability properly enforceable in a federal court, to be included in determining the amount in controversy. Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. Jones, 290 U.S. 199, 54 S.Ct. 133, 78 L.Ed. 267.

As originally enacted the amount of attorney's fees was limited to $20 but this limitation was removed by amendment in 1949. The 1953 amendment added "or suits founded upon a sworn account or accounts."

Reversed.


Summaries of

Crescent Lumber Shingle Company v. Rotherum

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jan 25, 1955
218 F.2d 638 (5th Cir. 1955)
Case details for

Crescent Lumber Shingle Company v. Rotherum

Case Details

Full title:CRESCENT LUMBER SHINGLE COMPANY, Appellant, v. J.C. ROTHERUM and R.W…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jan 25, 1955

Citations

218 F.2d 638 (5th Cir. 1955)

Citing Cases

Stokes v. Reeves

It is clear that where there is a statute allowing attorneys' fees to a successful litigant in effect in the…

Singleton v. Vance County Board of Education

73), when added to the additional loss of earnings which he contends he should have recovered ($4,546.85),…