From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crenshaw-Bruce v. Ryan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Nov 29, 2018
No. CV17-4337 PHX DGC (DMF) (D. Ariz. Nov. 29, 2018)

Opinion

No. CV17-4337 PHX DGC (DMF)

11-29-2018

Carleen Crenshaw-Bruce, Petitioner, v. Charles L. Ryan, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

Petitioner Carleen Crenshaw-Bruce has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Doc. 1. United States Magistrate Deborah M. Fine has issued a report and recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice. Doc. 23. No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). The Court will accept the R&R and deny the petition.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The R&R (Doc. 23) is accepted.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is denied and dismissed with prejudice.

3. A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied
4. The Clerk is directed to terminate this action.

Dated this 29th day of November, 2018.

/s/_________

David G. Campbell

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Crenshaw-Bruce v. Ryan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Nov 29, 2018
No. CV17-4337 PHX DGC (DMF) (D. Ariz. Nov. 29, 2018)
Case details for

Crenshaw-Bruce v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:Carleen Crenshaw-Bruce, Petitioner, v. Charles L. Ryan, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Nov 29, 2018

Citations

No. CV17-4337 PHX DGC (DMF) (D. Ariz. Nov. 29, 2018)