From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Creel v. Iuniverse, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Oct 22, 2009
Civil Action No. 09-cv-01753-CMA-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 22, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-cv-01753-CMA-BNB.

October 22, 2009


ORDER


This matter arises on Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint [Doc. # 48, filed 10/19/2009] (the "Motion to Amend"). The Motion to Amend is DENIED without prejudice, subject to renewal in a manner consistent with this Order.

The plaintiff seeks leave to amend to "identify Tino Georgiou and K.G. Glaub as the same person, to correct the state of incorporation of Lulu Enterprises, Inc. and Lulu Press, Inc., and to delete Counts II, III, and IV." Motion to Amend at p. 1. A copy of the proposed second amended complaint is not attached as an exhibit to the Motion to Amend, however, nor has the proposed second amended complaint otherwise been submitted to the court. I will not grant a motion to amend in the abstract, and I require that any proposed amendment be submitted as an exhibit to the motion to amend.

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Amend is DENIED without prejudice, subject to renewal in a manner consistent with this Order.


Summaries of

Creel v. Iuniverse, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Oct 22, 2009
Civil Action No. 09-cv-01753-CMA-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 22, 2009)
Case details for

Creel v. Iuniverse, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CATHERINE CREEL, Plaintiff, v. iUNIVERSE, INC., AN Indiana corporation…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Oct 22, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-cv-01753-CMA-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 22, 2009)