From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Creedon v. Condor Manufacturing Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

January, 1932.


Order granting plaintiff a preference reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The plaintiff receiver, appointed by a court of a foreign State, is not such a receiver as is entitled to a preference under section 138, subdivision 7, of the Civil Practice Act. ( Hough v. Canfield, 54 App. Div. 510: Daly v. Wood, 29 Misc. 105.) Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Creedon v. Condor Manufacturing Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

Creedon v. Condor Manufacturing Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ALEX W. CREEDON, as Receiver for THE HARTFORD DROP FORGE COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1932

Citations

235 App. Div. 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)