From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crecelius v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 17, 2011
Case No. 2:11-CV-382-KJD-CWH (D. Nev. Oct. 17, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-CV-382-KJD-CWH.

October 17, 2011


ORDER


Presently before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Complaint (#8). Plaintiff filed a response in opposition (#13).

Plaintiff argues that the Complaint was properly signed in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a), because the person who signed the complaint on his behalf, Patricia A. Crecelius, had authority under a "Durable Power of Attorney" to "execute, acknowledge, and deliver any and all instruments of every nature and kind[,]" and to "engage in any administrative or legal proceedings or lawsuits[.]" Defendants have failed to respond to Plaintiff's assertion. Nevada Revised Statute 162A.560 expressly allows language granting the authority contained in the Durable Power of Attorney at issue in this action.

Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Complaint (#8) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Crecelius v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 17, 2011
Case No. 2:11-CV-382-KJD-CWH (D. Nev. Oct. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Crecelius v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

Case Details

Full title:TODD CRECELIUS, Plaintiff, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Oct 17, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-CV-382-KJD-CWH (D. Nev. Oct. 17, 2011)