From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crayon v. Hill

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 9, 2013
2:13-cv-0350 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2013)

Opinion


CHARLES E. CRAYON, Plaintiff, v. RICK HILL, et al., Defendants. No. 2:13-cv-0350 KJN P United States District Court, E.D. California. December 9, 2013

          ORDER

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 14, 2013, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. On December 4, 2013, plaintiff filed a motion for deadline confirmation. In this motion, plaintiff states that he received no order from the court regarding the deadline for filing his opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss. Plaintiff requests that the court set a deadline for the filing of his opposition.

         The order filed August 16, 2013, referenced the rules for determining filing deadlines. (See ECF No. 22 at 3.) Due to plaintiff's misunderstanding regarding the deadline for filing his opposition, plaintiff is granted thirty days to file his opposition.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion for deadline confirmation (ECF No. 41) is granted;

2. Plaintiff's opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss is due within thirty days of the date of this order.


Summaries of

Crayon v. Hill

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 9, 2013
2:13-cv-0350 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Crayon v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES E. CRAYON, Plaintiff, v. RICK HILL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 9, 2013

Citations

2:13-cv-0350 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2013)