From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craycroft v. Ferrall

U.S.
Mar 30, 1970
397 U.S. 335 (1970)

Summary

In Craycroft v. Ferrall, 397 U.S. 335, this Court vacated the judgment of the Ninth Circuit that the petitioner there had to appeal to the Board for the Correction of Naval Records before proceeding in federal court.

Summary of this case from Parisi v. Davidson

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 718, Misc.

Decided March 30, 1970

Certiorari granted; 408 F.2d 587, vacated and remanded.

John Caughlan for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold for respondents.


The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

Upon consideration of the suggestion of the Solicitor General and upon an examination of the entire record, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court.

The Solicitor General concedes that the administrative remedies that the Court of Appeals held should first be exhausted by the petitioner, have either been exhausted or are nonexistent. The sole remaining question therefore seems to be whether petitioner's failure to seek relief in the Court of Military Appeals precludes consideration of petitioner's claims by the federal courts. While the Solicitor General concedes that resort to that judicial remedy does not preclude consideration of petitioner's claim by the federal courts, there is a conflict among the circuits. It is for consideration of that question, or alternatively the merits, that the case is remanded.


Summaries of

Craycroft v. Ferrall

U.S.
Mar 30, 1970
397 U.S. 335 (1970)

In Craycroft v. Ferrall, 397 U.S. 335, this Court vacated the judgment of the Ninth Circuit that the petitioner there had to appeal to the Board for the Correction of Naval Records before proceeding in federal court.

Summary of this case from Parisi v. Davidson

In Craycroft, and by departmental directive, the United States has indicated it will no longer press the position that originally persuaded this court to render its decision in Noyd.

Summary of this case from Polsky v. Wetherill
Case details for

Craycroft v. Ferrall

Case Details

Full title:CRAYCROFT v . FERRALL ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 30, 1970

Citations

397 U.S. 335 (1970)
90 S. Ct. 1152

Citing Cases

Parisi v. Davidson

We have been advised that his appeal before the Court of Military Review is now pending. This is the…

Montgomery v. Rumsfeld

McGee v. United States, supra, 402 U.S. at 484, 91 S.Ct. at 1568; McKart v. United States, supra, 395 U.S. at…