From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crawford v. Wright

Superior Court of Delaware
Jan 1, 1848
5 Del. 59 (Del. Super. Ct. 1848)

Opinion

Spring Sessions, 1848.

THIS was an action of replevin for a carriage, c. The pleas were non cepit, and cognizance as bailiff of James Martin, for a half year's rent in arrear from plaintiff to said Martin. Replication, no rent in arrear; non dimisit; non tenuit.

Platt and Gray, for plaintiff.

Bayard, jr., for defendant.


The plaintiff proved the taking of a carriage; and closed. The defendant proved that the premises were rented as a stable, for the manure as the rent; and proceeded to prove the value of the manure.

Mr. Gray objected to any other proof of the value of the manure, than that furnished by the appraisers under section 2 of the act of 1829, (Digest 361.)

But the court overruled the objection; considering that provision as applicable only to a mode of ascertaining the rent upon a sale of the distress, without replevin.

The jury are to ascertain the amount of the rent, or value, when the rent is in kind.

Verdict for defendant.


Summaries of

Crawford v. Wright

Superior Court of Delaware
Jan 1, 1848
5 Del. 59 (Del. Super. Ct. 1848)
Case details for

Crawford v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDER B. CRAWFORD vs. RICHARD WRIGHT

Court:Superior Court of Delaware

Date published: Jan 1, 1848

Citations

5 Del. 59 (Del. Super. Ct. 1848)