From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crawford v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 6, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-5156 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 6, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-5156

10-06-2020

MICHELLE CANDACE CRAWFORD, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 6th day of October 2020, upon careful consideration of Plaintiff Michelle Candace Crawford's Statement of Issues and Brief in support of her request for review (ECF No. 12), Social Security Commissioner Andrew M. Saul's Response (ECF No. 17), Crawford's Reply (ECF No. 19), the Administrative Record (ECF No. 11) and the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart, (ECF No. 23), and it appearing that neither Plaintiff nor the Commissioner have objected to the report, it is ORDERED that:

The Report and Recommendation was sent to all parties of record on June 29, 2020, together with a Notice from the Clerk of Court advising the parties of their obligation to file any objections within 14 days after service of the Notice. See Local R. Civ. P. 72.1 IV(b) ("Any party may object to a magistrate judge's proposed findings, recommendations or report under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and subsections 1(c) and (d) of this Rule within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy thereof."). As of today's date, however, no objections have been filed.

1. the Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED ;
2. Plaintiff's request for review is GRANTED, and the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is REVERSED to the extent that the matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation; and

3. the Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case.

When no objection is made to a Report and Recommendation, the Court should, as a matter of good practice, "satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee notes; see also Oldrati v. Apfel, 33 F. Supp. 2d 397, 399 (E.D. Pa. 1998). No clear error appears on the face of the record and the Court accordingly accepts Judge Hart's Recommendation.

"The court shall have power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing." 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). --------

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gerald J . Pappert

GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.


Summaries of

Crawford v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 6, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-5156 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 6, 2020)
Case details for

Crawford v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:MICHELLE CANDACE CRAWFORD, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Oct 6, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-5156 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 6, 2020)