Opinion
23-1430
10-02-2023
Marla Crawford, Appellant Pro Se. Edmund J. O'Meally, PESSIN KATZ LAW, P.A., Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: September 28, 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (8:20-cv-00048-JKB)
Marla Crawford, Appellant Pro Se.
Edmund J. O'Meally, PESSIN KATZ LAW, P.A., Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Marla F. Crawford appeals the district court's order denying her summary judgment motion and granting Defendant summary judgment in Crawford's employment discrimination action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) ("The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief."). We have reviewed the record in conjunction with the arguments Crawford raises on appeal and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. Crawford v. Prince George's Cnty. Bd. of Educ., No. 8:20-cv-00048-JKB (D. Md. filed Mar. 21, 2023 &entered Mar. 22, 2023). We deny all pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.