From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crawford v. Fid. Brokerage Servs.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jan 10, 2024
No. 23-13283 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 10, 2024)

Opinion

23-13283

01-10-2024

CHRISTOPHER CRAWFORD, JR., Plaintiff, v. FIDELITY BROKERAGE SERVICES, LLC, and MICHAEL RALSTON, Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIMS

Nancy G. Edmunds United States District Judge

Plaintiff Christopher Crawford, Jr. brings claims against Defendants Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC and Michael Ralston under Michigan common law (defamation and wrongful termination), Michigan's Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act (“ELCRA”), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (“Title VII”). The Court has federal question jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Title VII claims (Counts III and V), but Plaintiff's common law and ELCRA claims (Counts I, II, IV, and VI) are based on state law. Because the parties in this case appear to be nondiverse, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims so as to avoid jury confusion. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(4); Moor v. Cty. of Alameda, 411 U.S. 693, 716 (1973); Padilla v. City of Saginaw, 867 F.Supp. 1309, 1315 (E.D. Mich. 1994). Thus, pursuant to § 1367(c), Plaintiff's state law claims are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court will retain jurisdiction over Plaintiff's federal claims only.

SO ORDERED.

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on January 10, 2024, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.


Summaries of

Crawford v. Fid. Brokerage Servs.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jan 10, 2024
No. 23-13283 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 10, 2024)
Case details for

Crawford v. Fid. Brokerage Servs.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER CRAWFORD, JR., Plaintiff, v. FIDELITY BROKERAGE SERVICES, LLC…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jan 10, 2024

Citations

No. 23-13283 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 10, 2024)