From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crawford v. Easley

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 5, 2008
280 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-6301.

Submitted: May 29, 2008.

Decided: June 5, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:07-ct-03032-BO).

Thomas Everette Crawford, Jarvis Deangelo Broadnax, Appellants Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Thomas Everette Crawford and Jarvis Deangelo Broadnax appeal the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Crawford v. Easley, No. 5:07-ct-03032-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Crawford v. Easley

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 5, 2008
280 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Crawford v. Easley

Case Details

Full title:Thomas Everette CRAWFORD; Jarvis Deangelo Broadnax, Plaintiffs-Appellants…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 5, 2008

Citations

280 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2008)