From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crawford v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Apr 16, 1935
81 S.W.2d 575 (Ky. Ct. App. 1935)

Opinion

Decided April 16, 1935.

Appeal from Clinton Circuit Court.

E. BERTRAM and J.G. SMITH for appellants.

BAILEY P. WOOTTON, Attorney General, and H. HAMILTON RICE, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Reversing.

Jux Crawford and Rex Crawford have prayed an appeal from a judgment convicting them of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and fixing their punishment at a fine of $200 and 60 days' imprisonment in the county jail.

It is conceded by the commonwealth that the evidence on which the accused were convicted was given by an accomplice, and that his evidence was not corroborated by other evidence tending to connect them with the commission of the offense. That being true, a conviction could not be had, and it was the duty of the court to direct an acquittal. Section 241, Criminal Code of Practice; Craft v. Commonwealth, 80 Ky. 349, 4 Ky. Law Rep. 182; Wilson v. Commonwealth, 255 Ky. 632, 75 S.W.2d 202.

Wherefore, the appeal is granted, and judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial in conformity with this opinion.


Summaries of

Crawford v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Apr 16, 1935
81 S.W.2d 575 (Ky. Ct. App. 1935)
Case details for

Crawford v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:Crawford et al. v. Commonwealth

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Apr 16, 1935

Citations

81 S.W.2d 575 (Ky. Ct. App. 1935)
81 S.W.2d 575